Baumgartner. E. Bell, P. Brophy, S. Hoadley, C. His, S. Joseph, D. Orrill, C. Puntambekar, S. Sandoval, W & Tabak, I. (2003). Design-Based Research: An Emerging Paradigm for Educational Inquiry, Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8
Bazeley, P. (2003). Teaching Mixed Methods, Qualitative Research Journal, 3. 117-126.
Betzner, A. E.(2008).
Pragmatic and Dialectic Mixed Method Approaches: An EmpiricalComparison, PHD Dissertation, Faculty of the graduate school of the university of Minnesota, Retrived on 3 February 2009 from: http://
www.conservancy .umn.edu/bitstream/46961/3/Betzner_umn_0130E_10139.pdf
Caracelli, V.J & Greene. J. C. (1997). Crafting mixed-method evaluation designs. New Directions for Evaluation, 74, 19-32.
Creswell, J. W. Plano Clark, V. L. Gutmann, M. L & Hanson, W. E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 209–240). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Retrived on 3 February 2009 from : http://www.sagepub.com/upm-data/19291_Chapter_7.pdf
Doyle, L. Brady, A. M & Byrne, G. (2009). An overview of mixed methods research, Journal of Research in Nursing, 14 (2) 175–185
Greene. J.C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(2). 190-198
Greene, J. C & Caracelli, V. (1997). Defining and describing the paradigm issue in mixed-method evaluation. In J. Greene&V. Caracelli (Eds.), Advances in mixed-method evaluation: The challenges and benefits of integrating diverse paradigms. New Directions for Evaluation (74, pp. 5–17).San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Hall, B & Howard, K. (2008). A Synergistic Approach: Conducting Mixed Methods Research With Typological and Systemic Design Considerations, Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(3), 248-269
Jang, E. E. McDougall, D. E. Pollon, D.,
Herbert, M., & Russell, P. (2008). Integrative Mixed Methods Data Analytic Strategies in Research on School Success in Challenging Circumstances, Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(3), 221-247
Johnson, R. B & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004).
Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come, Educational Researcher, 33 (7), 14-26.
Kadudhin, C. Hecht, S. Sasson, T & Saxe, L. (2008). Triangulation and Mixed Methods Designs: Practicing What We Preach in the Evaluation of an Israel Experience Educational Program, Field Methods,20(1), 46-65.
Krauss, S. E. (2005). Research Paradigms and Meaning Making: A Primer, The Qualitative Report, 10(4), 758-770.
Lawrenz, F & Huffman, D. (2002). The Archipelago Approach To Mixed Method Evaluation, American Journal of Evaluation, 23(3), 331–338.
Lawrenz, F. & Huffman, D. (2005). Mixed Method STEM Evaluation –, Retrived on 22 February 2009 from :http://www..eval.org/Publications/example_NDE _Proposal.pdf
Lodico, M. G., Spaulding, D. T.,& Voegtle, K. H.,(2006). Methods in educational research: From Theory to Practice, Published by Jossey-Bass
Luo, M. & Dappen, L.(2005). Mixed-methods design for an objective-based evaluation of a magnet school assistance project, Evaluation and Program Planning 28, 109–118
Miller, S. I., & Fredericks, M. (2006).NMixed-Methods and Evaluation Research: Trends and Issues, Qualitative Health Research, 16(4), 567-579.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Witcher, A. E., Collins, K. M. T., Filer, J. D., Wiedmaier, C. D & Moore, C. W.(2007). Students’ Perceptions of Characteristics of Effective College Teachers: A Validity Study of a Teaching Evaluation Form Using a Mixed-Methods Analysis, American Educational Research Journal,44(1), 113–160.
Reeves, T. (2006). Educational paradigms, Retrived on 28 February 2009 from: www.wikieducator.org/images/f/f3/Educational_paradigms.pdf
Waysman, M & Savaya, R. (1997). Mixed Method Evaluation: A Case Study, Evaluation Practice, 18(3), 227-237.
)