Alqahtani, M. M., & Powell, A. B. (2016). Instrumental appropriation of a collaborative, dynamic-geometry environment and geometrical understanding.
International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 4(2), 72–83.
https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.38054
Allah Karami, A (2025). The Effect of Wordwall Artificial Intelligence on Agentic Engagement and Academic Performance of ElementaryStudents in Mathematics. Technology and Scholarship in Education. 5 (Special Issue): 75-91. [In Persian]
https://doi.org/: 10.30473/t-edu.2025.75854.1332
Bilgili, S., & Çiltaş, A. (2025). Improving mathematical modeling competencies of mathematics teachers in a technology-supported learning environment.
Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1509652.
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1509652
Borba, M. C., Chiari, A. S., & Almeida, H. R. F. L. (2025). A systematic review of technology use in middle and high school mathematics education.
Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1644284.
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1644284
Büscher, C., & Schnell, S. (2017). Students’ emergent modeling of statistical measures: A case study.
Statistics Education Research Journal, 16(2), 144–162.
https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v16i2.188
Durandt, R., Blum, W., & Lindl, A. (2021). Fostering mathematical modelling competency of South African engineering students: Which influence does the teaching design have?
Educational Studies in Mathematics, 109, 361–381.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10068-7
Darmanova, Z., Abylkassymova, A., & Nurmukhamedova, Z. (2025). A systematic review of technology use in middle and high school mathematics education: Insights from contextual, methodological, and evaluation characteristics.
Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1644284.
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1644284
Drijvers, P., Godino, J. D., Font, V., & Trouche, L. (2013). One episode, two lenses: A reflective analysis of student learning with computer algebra from instrumental and onto-semiotic perspectives.
Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82, 23–49.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9416-8
Eckert, A., & Nilsson, P. (2022). The emergence of the “FlexTech” orchestration of inferential reasoning on pattern generalization.
Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 8(1), 1–26.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-021-00098-4
Elia, I., & Spiro, R. J. (2006). Learning mathematics through multiple representations: The case of trigonometric functions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1–2), 55–74.
Fererde, A. T., Mihrka, A. A., Ayele, M. A., & Arara, A. A. (2024). Enhancing students’ conceptual understanding and problem-solving skills in learning trigonometry through contextual-based mathematical modeling instruction.
International Journal of Secondary Education, 12(4), 108–119.
https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsedu.20241204.15
Juandi, J., Sugiatno, & Noviani, E. (2025). Enhancing students’ conceptual understanding of trigonometric functions through GeoGebra based learning.
Al Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 16(1), 55–70.
https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v16i1.25653
Koyunkaya, M. Y., & Dede, Y. (2024). Using different digital tools in designing and solving mathematical modelling problems.
Education and Information Technologies, 29, 1–24.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12577-3
Krawitz, J., Chang, Y.-P., Yang, K.-L., & Schukajlow, S. (2021). The role of reading comprehension in mathematical modelling: Improving the construction of a real-world model and interest in Germany and Taiwan. ZDM – Mathematics Education. Advance online publication.
Li, M., & Li, B. (2024). Unravelling the dynamics of technology integration in mathematics education. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 23687–23715.
Mohammadi, A., & Nasiri, M. (2025). Identifying and prioritizing the essential and fundamental requirements for smart school implementation: A case study of Khuzestan province. Journal of Education, 5(1), 9–23. [In Persian]
Moradi, R & Bayrvandi, V (2025). Effectiveness of Technology-Based Active Learning Strategy on Academic Satisfaction and Cognitive Flexibility of Students in Experimental Science Course, Technology and Scholarship in Education,4(4):41-58.
https://doi.org/10.30473/tedu.2025.72617.1208
Mosese, N., & Ogbonnaya, U. I. (2021). GeoGebra and students' learning achievement in trigonometric functions.
Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 16(2), 827–846.
https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v16i2.5685
Patel, A., & Pfannkuch, M. (2018). Developing a statistical modeling framework. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 50(7), 1197–1212.
Rojano, T., & Sutherland, R. (2020). Technology and curricula in mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education (2nd ed., pp. 849–853). Springer.
Schönbrodt, S., Wohak, K., & Frank, M. (2022). Digital tools to enable collaborative mathematical modeling online. Modelling in Science Education and Learning, 15(1), 151–174. https://doi.org/10.4995/msel.2022.16269
Firmansyah, R., Suryadi, D., & Turmudi, T. (2024). Enhancing students’ conceptual understanding and problem-solving skills in learning trigonometry through contextual-based mathematical modeling. International Journal of Secondary Education.
Freiman, V. (2020). Technology design in mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education (2nd ed., pp. 853–861). Springer Nature.
Ghosh, J. B. (2015). Learning mathematics in secondary school: The case of mathematical modelling enabled by technology. In
Selected regular lectures from the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 203–222). Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17187-6_12
Goos, M., Soury-Lavergne, S., Assude, T., Brown, J., Kong, C. M., Glover, D., & Sinclair, M. (2010). Teachers and teaching: Theoretical perspectives and issues concerning classroom implementation. In C. Hoyles & J. Lagrange (Eds.),
Mathematics education and technology—Rethinking the terrain (pp. 311–328). Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0146-0_14
Greefrath, G., Siller, H.-S., Klock, H., & Wess, R. (2022). Pre-service secondary teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for the teaching of mathematical modelling.
Educational Studies in Mathematics, 109(2), 383–407.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10038-z
Gurmu, F., Tuge, C., & Hunde, A. B. (2024). Effects of GeoGebra assisted instructional methods on students’ conceptual understanding of geometry.
Cogent Education, 11(1), 2379745.
https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2379745
Haugstad, A., & Isabwe, G. M. N. (2017). Using the theory of instrumental genesis to study students’ work with a digital tool for applying integrals in a kinematic simulation. In Proceedings of CERME 10 (pp. 2088–2096). Dublin, Ireland.
Hochmuth, R., Peters, J., Rønning, F., & Winsløw, C. (2024). Modelling mathematics for educational research and practice: A comparison of two theoretical approaches. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 118, 153–168.
Van Dijke-Droogers, M., Drijvers, P., & Bakker, A. (2021). Statistical modeling processes through the lens of instrumental genesis.
Educational Studies in Mathematics, 107(2), 235–260.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-10023-y
Usman, A. N., Arifudin, R., Ilham Aditya, R., Maulana, B. S., & Lavicza, Z. (2024). Using different digital tools in designing and solving mathematical modelling problems. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 19035–19065.
)