تحلیل رابطه مسئولیت‌پذیری اجتماعی و کارآفرینی اجتماعی با تأکید بر نقش انگیزش پیشرفت و دلالت‌های آن در فناوری آموزشی و دانش‌پژوهی تربیتی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری جامعه شناسی، واحد دهاقان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، دهاقان، ایران.

2 استادیار جامعه شناسی، واحد دهاقان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، دهاقان، ایران.

3 استادیار گروه علوم اجتماعی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، واحد دهاقان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، دهاقان، ایران

چکیده

هدف این پژوهش تأثیر مسئولیت‌پذیری اجتماعی بر کارآفرینی اجتماعی با تمرکز بر نقش انگیزش پیشرفت در بین زنان کارآفرین استان کرمان است. با توجه به ظرفیت فناوری‌های نوین در توسعه قابلیت‌های فردی و اجتماعی، این پژوهش به دنبال استخراج دلالت‌هایی برای طراحی محیط‌های یادگیری الکترونیکی و برنامه‌های درسی کارآفرینی اجتماعی است. این تحقیق از نظر ماهیت و روش، توصیفی و از نظر هدف، کاربردی است که با استفاده از شیوه تحقیقات میدانی به جمع‌آوری داده‌ها پرداخت. ابزارهای پژوهش شامل پرسشنامه محقق‌ساخته مسئولیت‌پذیری اجتماعی، پرسشنامه کارآفرینی اجتماعی عرب (۱۳۹۰) و پرسشنامه انگیزش پیشرفت هلم دیچ و اسپنس (۱۹۷۷) بود. جامعه آماری شامل کلیه زنان کارآفرین استان کرمان (۶۷۷ نفر) و نمونه بر اساس فرمول کوکران ۲۵۰ نفر تعیین شد. نمونه‌گیری به روش تصادفی طبقه‌ای انجام شد. داده‌ها با استفاده از نرم‌افزار SPSS و روش‌های تحلیل مسیر و معادلات ساختاری تحلیل شدند. بر اساس نتایج، مسئولیت‌پذیری اجتماعی سازمانی تأثیر مثبت و معناداری بر کارآفرینی اجتماعی دارد. همچنین انگیزش پیشرفت با مسئولیت‌پذیری اجتماعی و کارآفرینی اجتماعی همبستگی مثبت و معناداری نشان داد، اما نقش واسطه‌ای آن تأیید نشد. این یافته‌ها برای طراحی دوره‌های آموزش الکترونیکی و برنامه‌های درسی مبتنی بر شایستگی در حوزه کارآفرینی اجتماعی اهمیت دارد و نشان می‌دهد که تأکید صرف بر انگیزش فردی بدون توجه به بسترهای فناورانه و ارزش‌محور کافی نیست.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Analyzing the Relationship Between Social Responsibility and Social Entrepreneurship With an Emphasis on the Role of Motivation for Progress and its Implications for Educational Technology and Scholarship

نویسندگان [English]

  • Abbas Ferdosi 1
  • Seyyed Naser Hejazi 2
  • Mohamad Ali Chitsaz 3
1 PhD student in Sociology, Dehaqan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Dehaqan, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor of Sociology, Dehaqan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Dehaqan, Iran.
3 Assistant Professor of Social Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Deh.C., Islamic Azad University, Dehaghan, Iran
چکیده [English]

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of social responsibility on social entrepreneurship, focusing on the role of motivation for progress among women entrepreneurs in Kerman province. Considering the capacity of modern technologies in developing individual and social capabilities, this research seeks to extract implications for designing e-learning environments and curricula for social entrepreneurship. This research was descriptive in nature and method, and applied in terms of purpose, collecting data through field research methods. The research instruments included a researcher-made social responsibility questionnaire, Arab's Social Entrepreneurship Questionnaire (2011/1390), and the Helmreich and Spence Motivation for Progress Questionnaire (1977). The statistical population consisted of all women entrepreneurs in Kerman province (N=677), and the sample size was determined as 250 people based on Cochran's formula. Stratified random sampling was employed. Data were analyzed using SPSS software, path analysis, and structural equation modeling. Based on the results, organizational social responsibility has a positive and significant effect on social entrepreneurship. Furthermore, motivation for progress showed a positive and significant correlation with social responsibility and social entrepreneurship; however, its mediating role was not confirmed. These findings are important for designing e-learning courses and competency-based curricula in the field of social entrepreneurship, indicating that an exclusive emphasis on individual motivation, without considering technological and value-based contexts, is insufficient.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Social Responsibility
  • Social Entrepreneurship
  • Motivation for Progress
  • Educational Technology
  • Blended Learning

مراجع

Austin, J. Stevenson, H & Wei-Skillern, J. (2012). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: same, different, or both? Revista de Administracao, 47(3).
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
Bhushan, B. (2020). Motivational Model of Social Entrepreneurship: Explor i ng the Shaping of Engagement of Social Entrepreneur. In Methodological Issues in Social Entrepreneurship Knowledge and Practice , Springer.
Brush, C. G., Carter, N. M., Gatewood, E. J., Greene, P. G., & Hart, M. M. (2006). Growth-oriented women entrepreneurs and their businesses: A global research perspective. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Brush, C. G., de Bruin, A., & Welter, F. (2009). A gender‐aware framework for women's entrepreneurship. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 8–24.
 
 
Brush, G Hisrich,R., “Womenowned Businesses, An Exploratory Study Comparing factors Addecting Performance”. Rise business Research Institute for small & Emerging Business, 2020.
Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39-48.
Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct. Business & Society, 38(3), 268–295.
Choi, D. Y., & Majumdar, S. (2014). Social entrepreneurship as an essentially contested concept: Opening a new avenue for systematic future research. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(3), 363–376.
Crisan, C M and Borza   a, Social Entrepreneurship and Corporate Social Responsibilities, International Business Research Vol. 5, No. 2; February 2022.
Dacin, M. T., Dacin, P. A., & Matear, M. (2010). Social entrepreneurship: Why we don't need a new theory and how we move forward from here. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3), 37-57.
Dahles, H., Verver, M., Khieng, S., Manders, I., & Schellens, N. (2019). Scaling up social enterprise: Predicament or prospect in a comparative perspective.Journal of Social Entrepreneurship.
Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(1), 1–13.
Davidsson, piterz & Honig, Benson. (2013). "The role of Corporate social responsibility among nascent entrepreneurs, Journal of Business Venturing, 3(18),301-331.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.
Dees, J. G. (1998). The meaning of social entrepreneurship. Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership.
Dees, J. G. (2001). The Meaning of Social Entrepreneurship. Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership.
Eddleston, K. A., & Powell, G. N. (2012). Nurturing entrepreneurs’ work–family balance: A gendered perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(3), 513–541.
Jadidi Mohammadabadi, A & Zare, P. (2026). Sociology of Education. Tehran: Payame Noor University Press.
Hockerts, K. (2015). How hybrid organizations turn antagonistic assets into complementarities. California Management Review, 57(3), 83–108.
Hockerts, K. (2017). Determinants of social entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 105-130.
Kapstein, E. B. (2001). The Corporate Ethics Crusade. Foreign Affairs, 80(5), 105–119.
Kickul, J., & Lyons, T. (2012). Understanding social entrepreneurship: The relentless pursuit of mission in an ever changing world. Routledge.
Kickul, J., & Lyons, T. (2012). Understanding social entrepreneurship: The relentless pursuit of mission in an ever changing world. Routledge.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717.
Mair, J. & Martí, J. (2016). “Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight, Journal of World Business, 41(1): pp 36- 44.
Mair, J., & Noboa, E. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: How intentions to create a social venture are formed. In J. Mair, J. Robinson, & K. Hockerts (Eds.), Social entrepreneurship (pp. 121–135). Palgrave Macmillan.
McClelland, D. C. (1961). The Achieving Society. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and Society: The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.
Schwartz, M. S., & Carroll, A. B. (2003). Corporate social responsibility: A three-domain approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(4), 503–530.
Shane, S. (2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship: The individual-opportunity nexus. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Shomali, S., Janani, H., (2018), Presenting a model of the impact of social responsibility on individual entrepreneurship in sports club managers in Tabriz, Physical Education and Sports Sciences Research, 1)3(.[In Persian].
Trevino, L. K., & Nelson, K. A. (2017). Managing business ethics: Straight talk about how to do it right. Wiley.
Zhao, H., Seibert, S. E., & Hills, G. E. (2010). The mediating role of self-efficacy in the development of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(4), 616–626.

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 02 دی 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 06 بهمن 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 06 اردیبهشت 1405
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار: 06 اردیبهشت 1405
  • تاریخ انتشار: 01 مهر 1405

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار